Basic Information about time series forecasting methods
When comparing time series forecasting methods based on accuracy and their benefits depending on the length of the data, especially in the context of financial data, several factors come into play. Financial data is often complex, with patterns affected by market conditions, economic events, and other external factors. Here’s a comparison:
Generally good for short-term forecasting when the data shows strong autocorrelation.
Well-suited for univariate time series. Effective for short-term predictions. Requires the data to be stationary.
Needs sufficient data to identify patterns and lags (typically at least 30-50 observations). Performance may degrade for very long-term forecasting due to model’s limitations in capturing complex patterns.
Better than ARIMA for data with strong seasonal patterns.
Handles both trend and seasonality. Useful for financial data with seasonal effects (e.g., quarterly earnings, monthly sales).
Requires several seasonal cycles to capture the seasonal effect accurately. Typically needs more data than ARIMA to model seasonal components properly.
Good for data with trends and seasonality.
Simple to implement and interpret. Effective for data with a clear trend and/or seasonality.
Can work with relatively short time series but performs better with more data. Useful for medium to long-term forecasting.
Comparable to or better than ARIMA/SARIMA for complex seasonal data.
Robust to missing data and outliers. Intuitive handling of holidays and seasonality. Suitable for business and financial forecasting.
Can handle shorter time series due to its ability to incorporate domain knowledge. Performs well with long-term data due to its flexibility in modeling.
High for capturing complex patterns and non-linear relationships.
Excellent for sequential data with long-term dependencies. Handles non-linearity and complex temporal patterns well.
Requires large datasets to train effectively. Computationally intensive, but capable of handling long time series with sufficient computational power.
High for data with multiple seasonalities and complex patterns.
Handles multiple seasonalities and non-linear patterns. Suitable for complex financial data with intricate seasonal patterns.
Requires a substantial amount of data to model complex seasonality accurately. Effective for long time series due to its ability to model multiple seasonal patterns.
High for multivariate time series data.
Captures the relationships among multiple time series. Suitable for financial data where multiple variables are interdependent (e.g., stock prices, interest rates).
Requires a large dataset to model the interdependencies accurately. Performs better with longer time series due to the complexity of multivariate relationships.
High for time series with time-varying parameters.
Adaptable to changing patterns over time. Effective for financial data with structural breaks or regime changes.
Can handle relatively short time series due to its flexibility. Performs better with longer time series where changes over time are significant.
High for capturing non-linear patterns and interactions.
Effective for complex data with non-linear relationships. Can handle various types of data and patterns.
Requires substantial data for training to avoid overfitting. Suitable for both short-term and long-term forecasting, given adequate training data.
ARIMA, SARIMA, and ETS are often sufficient and provide reliable results with relatively short time series.
SARIMA, Prophet, and ETS are beneficial, especially for seasonal data.
LSTM, TBATS, and VAR are more appropriate due to their ability to model complex and long-term dependencies.
ETS, Prophet, and ARIMA can perform reasonably well.
LSTM, TBATS, and VAR are more suitable as they leverage the additional data to capture intricate patterns and dependencies.