[Sweep GHA Fix] The GitHub Actions run failed with...

[sweep-ai]

Description

This pull request includes several changes to the codebase. The changes are as follows:

• In the apidef/api_definitions.go file, the InternalMeta struct has been modified to include a new field Disabled and the existing fields Path and Method have been reordered.
• A new file apidef/oas/internal.go has been added, which contains the Internal struct and two methods Fill and ExtractTo to fill and extract data from apidef.InternalMeta.
• In the apidef/oas/oas_test.go file, a new test case has been added to test the Disabled field in apidef.InternalMeta.
• In the apidef/oas/operation.go file, the Operation struct has been modified to include a new field Internal of type Internal.
• In the apidef/oas/operation_test.go file, a new test case has been added to test the Internal field in Operation.
• In the apidef/oas/schema/x-tyk-api-gateway.json file, a new definition X-Tyk-Internal has been added to represent the Internal field in the Operation struct.
• In the bin/ci-swagger.sh file, the script has been updated to handle errors and display appropriate error messages.
• A new file bin/error_handling.sh has been added, which contains functions to display error messages and exit the script with an error code.
• In the gateway/api_definition.go file, the compileInternalPathspathSpec function has been updated to skip disabled internal paths.

Summary

• Modified apidef/api_definitions.go to reorder fields in InternalMeta struct and add Disabled field.
• Added apidef/oas/internal.go to define Internal struct and methods to fill and extract data.
• Added test case in apidef/oas/oas_test.go to test Disabled field in InternalMeta.
• Modified apidef/oas/operation.go to add Internal field in Operation struct.
• Added test case in apidef/oas/operation_test.go to test Internal field in Operation.
• Updated apidef/oas/schema/x-tyk-api-gateway.json to include X-Tyk-Internal definition.
• Updated bin/ci-swagger.sh to handle errors and display error messages.
• Added bin/error_handling.sh to provide error handling functions.
• Updated gateway/api_definition.go to skip disabled internal paths in compileInternalPathspathSpec function.

[github-actions]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: This PR introduces changes to the codebase to handle errors in scripts and update API definitions.
• 📝 PR summary: The PR modifies several files, including apidef/api_definitions.go, apidef/oas/internal.go, apidef/oas/oas_test.go, apidef/oas/operation.go, apidef/oas/operation_test.go, apidef/oas/schema/x-tyk-api-gateway.json, bin/ci-swagger.sh, bin/error_handling.sh, and gateway/api_definition.go. The changes mainly involve adding error handling functions, updating API definitions, and adding test cases.
• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR touches multiple files and introduces new functionalities which require careful review.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes are logically grouped. However, it would be beneficial to ensure that all error messages are clear and informative. Also, it would be good to check if all possible error scenarios are covered by the error handling functions.

🤖 Code feedback:

---

relevant file	bin/ci-swagger.sh
suggestion	Consider using a variable for "swagger2.yaml" instead of hardcoding it. This would make the code more maintainable and flexible. [important]
relevant line	rm "swagger2.yaml"

---

relevant file	bin/error_handling.sh
suggestion	It would be beneficial to add some comments explaining what each function does. Although the function names are descriptive, comments would provide more context and make the code more readable. [medium]
relevant line	display_error_message() {

---

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the code feedback section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions. If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results. Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[buger]

API tests result - postgres15-sha256 env: success ✅
Branch used: refs/pull/5947/merge
Commit:
Triggered by: pull_request (@sweep-ai[bot])
Execution page

[buger]

API tests result - mongo44-sha256 env: success ✅
Branch used: refs/pull/5947/merge
Commit:
Triggered by: pull_request (@sweep-ai[bot])
Execution page

[buger]

API tests result - mongo44-murmur64 env: success ✅
Branch used: refs/pull/5947/merge
Commit:
Triggered by: pull_request (@sweep-ai[bot])
Execution page

[buger]

API tests result - postgres15-murmur64 env: success ✅
Branch used: refs/pull/5947/merge
Commit:
Triggered by: pull_request (@sweep-ai[bot])
Execution page