Skip to content

Conversation

camillobruni
Copy link
Contributor

For some benchmarks its easier to configure certain properties directly from the benchmark config.
See #143 which has different assertion values depending on which sources are used.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 26, 2025

Deploy Preview for webkit-jetstream-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b980e22
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/webkit-jetstream-preview/deploys/68af1f4ed4f53f0008497faa
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-165--webkit-jetstream-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@danleh danleh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two clarifying questions:

  1. This is essentially pulling out a small change from #143, right?
  2. Is the Benchmark() ctor argument not used right now? Because it would go from a plain number (the iteration count) to an object, so not sure if this breaks things.

Copy link
Contributor

@kmiller68 kmiller68 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable

@kmiller68
Copy link
Contributor

Is the Benchmark() ctor argument not used right now? Because it would go from a plain number (the iteration count) to an object, so not sure if this breaks things.

It's currently only used to pass an unused verbose flag for RexBench. So in theory this would break that but it's unused right now.

@camillobruni
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added a fix for RexBench just to be safe

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants