Force true #849
Open
Force true #849
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #849 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 58 58
Lines 3351 3351
Branches 648 648
=========================================
Hits 3351 3351 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
shazron
requested changes
Feb 19, 2025
| @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ describe('run', () => { | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledWith('application', | |||
| appConfig.application, | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'force-build': false, 'web-assets': false }), | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'web-assets': false }), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't force-build: true be in the object here?
| @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ describe('run', () => { | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledWith('application', | |||
| appConfig.application, | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'force-build': false, verbose: true }), | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ verbose: true }), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't force-build: true be in the object here?
| @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ describe('run', () => { | |||
|
|
|||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledWith('application', | |||
| appConfig.application, | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'force-build': false, 'web-assets': false, action: ['a', 'b', 'c'] }), | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'web-assets': false, action: ['a', 'b', 'c'] }), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't force-build: true be in the object here?
| @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ describe('run', () => { | |||
|
|
|||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledWith('application', | |||
| appConfig.application, | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'force-build': false, 'web-assets': false, action: ['c'] }), | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'web-assets': false, action: ['c'] }), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't force-build: true be in the object here?
| @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ describe('run', () => { | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledWith('application', | |||
| appConfig.application, | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'force-build': false, 'web-assets': false }), | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'web-assets': false }), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't force-build: true be in the object here?
| @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ describe('run', () => { | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledWith('application', | |||
| appConfig.application, | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'force-build': false, actions: false }), | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ actions: false }), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't force-build: true be in the object here?
| @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ describe('run', () => { | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) | |||
| expect(command.buildOneExt).toHaveBeenCalledWith('application', | |||
| appConfig.application, | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ 'force-build': false, actions: false }), | |||
| expect.objectContaining({ actions: false }), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't force-build: true be in the object here?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This changes the default flags, but no implementation.
Effectively the default behavior will be:
aio app build --force-buildaio app deploy --force-buildRelated Issue
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist: