This repository has been archived by the owner on May 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
nullfs: don't require an entitlement #9
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This makes nullfs usable for non-system processes as a "bind mount" mechanism, which then makes `chroot` a whole lot more valuable because we can create workable roots that share large swaths of the filesystem with the host (even if just read-only).
copumpkin
force-pushed
the
free-nullfs
branch
from
bab07f4 to
3d26c1e
Compare
|
Having something similar to bind mounts would be awesome! |
|
yes similar would be very useful. |
|
@copumpkin Any movement on that rdar ticket? :) |
|
sorry at present this repository is a pure mirror of opensource.apple.com and we are not able to accept community contributions for this project via github PR. Please use https://developer.apple.com/bug-reporting/ to submit your contributions. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes nullfs usable for non-system processes as a "bind mount" mechanism, which then makes
chroota whole lot more valuable because we can create workable roots that share large swaths of the filesystem with the host (even if just read-only).I also filed rdar://35545568 on this issue, asking for the entitlement requirement to be removed.
If this can't be accepted, can you possibly explain why it's needed in the first place? It seems pretty harmless to me but I might just be missing something.