Skip to content

dont generate enum values for reserved core errors #3522

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

sbiscigl
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:

The SDK assumes several existing enums that exist in core. If a service models these enums, there will multiple definitions of the enum value leading to a compilation error. This fixes code gen to ignore the modeled error and use the reserved core error.

Check all that applies:

  • Did a review by yourself.
  • Added proper tests to cover this PR. (If tests are not applicable, explain.)
  • Checked if this PR is a breaking (APIs have been changed) change.
  • Checked if this PR will not introduce cross-platform inconsistent behavior.
  • Checked if this PR would require a ReadMe/Wiki update.

Check which platforms you have built SDK on to verify the correctness of this PR.

  • Linux
  • Windows
  • Android
  • MacOS
  • IOS
  • Other Platforms

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Copy link
Contributor

@kai-ion kai-ion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@sbiscigl sbiscigl marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2025 19:38
@sbiscigl sbiscigl merged commit 6ff03a8 into main Aug 22, 2025
6 checks passed
@sbiscigl sbiscigl deleted the reserved-enum-fix branch August 22, 2025 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants