Skip to content

update kwargs #93

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Conversation

filip-michalsky
Copy link
Collaborator

why

what changed

test plan

Copy link

linear bot commented Jun 13, 2025

STG-493 Move act/extract/observe input to kwargs from pydantic inputs

pydantic models to be evaluated inside the functions

@filip-michalsky filip-michalsky marked this pull request as ready for review June 13, 2025 23:33
@miguelg719
Copy link
Collaborator

miguelg719 commented Jun 15, 2025

kwargs should be handled in the apis exposed to the user, not in the handlers right? need type safety in the internal logic
@filip-michalsky

@miguelg719 miguelg719 merged commit 20b977c into main Jun 16, 2025
2 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants