Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade io.springfox:springfox-swagger2 from 2.6.1 to 2.10.5 #5

Closed

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented Dec 6, 2020

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade io.springfox:springfox-swagger2 from 2.6.1 to 2.10.5.

:sparkles: Snyk has automatically assigned this pull request, [set who gets assigned](https://app.snyk.io/org/codecop/project/3de43449-2141-402a-acf9-cdcd6bb997d9/settings/integration?utm_source=github&utm_medium=upgrade-pr/settings/integration).

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 10 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 5 months ago, on 2020-06-23.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Information Disclosure
SNYK-JAVA-COMGOOGLEGUAVA-1015415
489/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.5
No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

👩‍💻 Set who automatically gets assigned

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@codecop codecop closed this Dec 13, 2020
@codecop codecop deleted the snyk-upgrade-4ad765f01678cb962904b408de3c17d9 branch December 13, 2020 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants