[expected.object.cons] Reorder arguments of is_same_v for consistency #7915
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
During the discussion of LWG 4222 it was noticed that [expected.object.cons] bullet (23.2) uses an atypical order of the is_same_v arguments, especially since this issue adds another bullet. To enforce consistency, the `remove_cvref_t<U>` argument is no also used as first (instead of second) argument in that bullet.
|
The suggestion on the LWG reflector was to submit this as editorial issue to harmonize the suggested proposed wording for LWG 4222. |
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2025
|
Looks obviously harmless. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
During the discussion of LWG 4222 it was noticed that [expected.object.cons] bullet (23.2) uses an atypical order of the is_same_v arguments, especially since this issue adds another bullet. To enforce consistency, the
remove_cvref_t<U>argument is no also used as first (instead of second) argument in that bullet.