iwlwifi: dvm: excessive if in rs_bt_update_lq()

There is no need to check 'priv->bt_ant_couple_ok' twice in rs_bt_update_lq(). The second check is always true. Thus, the expression can be simplified. Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <[email protected]>
davidlt · Nov 20, 2019 · e7babbe · e7babbe
1 parent e8503ae
commit e7babbe
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void rs_bt_update_lq(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx,
 		 * Is there a need to switch between
 		 * full concurrency and 3-wire?
 		 */
-		if (priv->bt_ci_compliance && priv->bt_ant_couple_ok)
+		if (priv->bt_ci_compliance)
 			full_concurrent = true;
 		else
 			full_concurrent = false;