Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a setting for data stream reindexing concurrency #119484

Conversation

masseyke
Copy link
Member

@masseyke masseyke commented Jan 2, 2025

This adds a setting that controls the number of indices that will be reindexed concurrently when a data stream is reindexed.

@masseyke masseyke marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2025 18:33
@masseyke masseyke requested a review from parkertimmins January 3, 2025 18:33
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team label Jan 3, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-data-management (Team:Data Management)

Copy link
Contributor

@parkertimmins parkertimmins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@masseyke masseyke added the auto-backport Automatically create backport pull requests when merged label Jan 8, 2025
@masseyke masseyke merged commit 82da6e9 into elastic:main Jan 8, 2025
16 checks passed
@masseyke masseyke deleted the making-data-stream-reindex-concurrency-configurable branch January 8, 2025 21:14
masseyke added a commit to masseyke/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Backport successful

Status Branch Result
8.x

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-backport Automatically create backport pull requests when merged :Data Management/Data streams Data streams and their lifecycles >non-issue Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team v8.18.0 v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants