Skip to content

[CI] Add a container for release builds #19289

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

KornevNikita
Copy link
Contributor

Our public releases should satisfy these requirements - https://vfxplatform.com Among them - glibc 2.28. The best way to achieve it - is to use ASWF images, which already have the required env.

I've created a container based on aswf/ci-base:2025.1. The original image already contains CUDA SDK, but not ROCm. So I've additionally installed it using https://rocm.docs.amd.com/projects/install-on-linux/en/latest/install/quick-start.html for RHEL 8.10.

Our public releases should satisfy these requirements - https://vfxplatform.com
Among them - glibc 2.28. The best way to achieve it - is to use ASWF images, which already have the required env.

I've created a container based on aswf/ci-base:2025.1. The original image already contains CUDA SDK, but not ROCm.
So I've additionally installed it using https://rocm.docs.amd.com/projects/install-on-linux/en/latest/install/quick-start.html for RHEL 8.10.
@KornevNikita KornevNikita requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2025 11:56
Copy link
Contributor

@sarnex sarnex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor comments

dnf -y install rocm && \
dnf clean all && rm -rf /var/cache/dnf

COPY scripts/docker_entrypoint.sh /docker_entrypoint.sh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we use the install_build_tools script too?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like it's not really needed here, build and all check-* tests pass already.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting

@KornevNikita
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sarnex could you please merge? pre-commit can be skipped, just fixed the file extension.

@sarnex sarnex merged commit 43ed1f0 into intel:sycl Jul 24, 2025
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants