Skip to content

Conversation

Tinche
Copy link
Contributor

@Tinche Tinche commented Apr 8, 2015

As far as I can tell, this entry point points to a non-existent function. What's the command 'lazy_object_proxy' supposed to do anyway?

As far as I can tell, this entry point points to a non-existent function. What's the command 'lazy_object_proxy' supposed to do anyway?
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.24%) to 95.43% when pulling b7dc3e3 on Tinche:master into e97041c on ionelmc:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.24%) to 95.43% when pulling b7dc3e3 on Tinche:master into e97041c on ionelmc:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.67% when pulling b7dc3e3 on Tinche:master into e97041c on ionelmc:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.24%) to 95.43% when pulling b7dc3e3 on Tinche:master into e97041c on ionelmc:master.

@landscape-bot
Copy link

Code Health
Code quality remained the same when pulling b7dc3e3 on Tinche:master into e97041c on ionelmc:master.

@ionelmc
Copy link
Owner

ionelmc commented Apr 8, 2015

Dooh! I forgot to remove it (I used a template for the project) 😁

ionelmc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2015
@ionelmc ionelmc merged commit 1c8997b into ionelmc:master Apr 8, 2015
@ionelmc
Copy link
Owner

ionelmc commented Apr 8, 2015

Thanks!

@ionelmc
Copy link
Owner

ionelmc commented Apr 11, 2015

Made a release now https://pypi.python.org/pypi/lazy-object-proxy/1.0.2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants