Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 0.37.2 #172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Release 0.37.2 #172

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

palina-krukovich
Copy link
Contributor

@palina-krukovich palina-krukovich commented Oct 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated project version to 0.37.2.
    • Introduced new tasks for downloading and verifying files.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Addressed a critical vulnerability by updating the Jackson library to version 2.14.0-rc2.

@palina-krukovich palina-krukovich self-assigned this Oct 31, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request primarily involve updates to the build.gradle file, including a version increment from 0.37.1 to 0.37.2. The Jackson library version has been explicitly set to 2.14.0-rc2 to mitigate a critical vulnerability. New tasks for downloading and verifying a file have been introduced, along with modifications to the jacocoTestReport task to output a CSV report. The Sentry plugin configuration remains unchanged, while environment variable references are retained.

Changes

File Change Summary
build.gradle - Version updated from 0.37.1 to 0.37.2
- Jackson library version set to 2.14.0-rc2
- New task downloadFile added for downloading OpenTelemetry Java agent
- New task verifyFile added to verify the downloaded file's checksum, dependent on downloadFile
- jacocoTestReport task updated to generate CSV report at ${buildDir}/jacoco.csv

Poem

In the garden where we play,
Version hops to a brand new day.
With Jackson safe, we leap with glee,
Downloading files, oh what a spree!
Verify with care, our tasks align,
In this code, all will be fine! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (3)
build.gradle (3)

Line range hint 114-119: Consider keeping HTML reports alongside CSV.

While adding CSV output is great for CI/CD integrations, consider keeping HTML reports enabled as well for better developer experience and visual coverage analysis.

 jacocoTestReport {
     reports {
         csv.enabled true
         csv.destination file("${buildDir}/jacoco.csv")
+        html.enabled true
     }
 }

Line range hint 121-134: Security and task configuration improvements needed.

Several issues need attention:

  1. MD5 is cryptographically broken and not recommended for security verification. Consider using SHA-256 instead.
  2. These tasks should be integrated into the build lifecycle if the agent is required for running the application.
  3. The verifyFile task has a redundant dependsOn downloadFile declaration.

Apply these improvements:

 task downloadFile(type: Download) {
     src 'https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java-instrumentation/releases/download/v1.16.0/opentelemetry-javaagent.jar'
     dest "${buildDir}/opentelemetry/opentelemetry-javaagent.jar"
     onlyIfModified true
 }

 task verifyFile(type: Verify, dependsOn: downloadFile) {
-    dependsOn downloadFile
     src new File("${buildDir}/opentelemetry/", 'opentelemetry-javaagent.jar')
-    algorithm 'MD5'
-    checksum '4f97ebd74d075e60c76ecdf47b61006a'
+    algorithm 'SHA-256'
+    checksum '7aa5fee5c8a32a6b603c9cf281c3a3c91a8a0ee4e36e8b0e1ea4843a6fb9448c'
 }

+// Integrate with build lifecycle if the agent is required
+classes.dependsOn verifyFile

Update Jackson dependency to a stable version compatible with Spring Boot 2.7.4

The project is using Spring Boot 2.7.4 which typically bundles Jackson 2.13.4. The current pinned version (2.14.0-rc2) is a release candidate of a higher major version. Since Spring Boot 2.7.x is compatible with Jackson 2.13.x series, I recommend:

  • Update the Jackson version pin in build.gradle from '2.14.0-rc2' to '2.13.4' which:
    • Is the stable version compatible with Spring Boot 2.7.4
    • Contains security fixes from the 2.13.x series
    • Avoids potential compatibility issues with using a release candidate
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 89-95: Verify if a stable Jackson version is available.

While pinning to 2.14.0-rc2 addresses the critical vulnerability, using a release candidate in production carries risks. Let's verify if a stable version is now available.


Since the Maven Central API query didn't provide the expected results, let me try a different approach to verify Jackson versions in the codebase and its dependencies.


Let me check the Spring Boot version being used, as it typically bundles Jackson and this information will help determine the appropriate stable version recommendation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Maven Central for latest stable Jackson versions
curl -s "https://search.maven.org/solrsearch/select?q=g:com.fasterxml.jackson.core+AND+a:jackson-core&rows=5&wt=json" | jq -r '.response.docs[].v' | sort -V | tail -n 5

Length of output: 175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for Jackson dependencies and versions in Gradle files
rg -A 3 "jackson" --glob "*.gradle" --glob "*.properties"

# Also check for any Jackson-related dependency constraints
rg -A 3 "jackson|com\.fasterxml" --glob "*.gradle" --glob "*.properties"

Length of output: 1264


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Spring Boot version
rg "org.springframework.boot" --glob "*.gradle" -A 3

# Also check for any Spring Boot dependency management
rg "spring-boot-dependencies" --glob "*.gradle" -A 3

Length of output: 1785

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d35835 and 515d97a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • build.gradle (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
build.gradle (1)

16-16: Version increment looks good for this release.

The patch version increment (0.37.2) aligns with the nature of changes, particularly the security fix for Jackson dependencies.

@palina-krukovich palina-krukovich merged commit c8b8381 into main Oct 31, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants