Refactor image pulling logic to support different pull commands, fix crictl pull failure

[LazyBusyYang]

• Updated the image pulling mechanism to conditionally format the pull command based on the command type (e.g., crictl).
• Improved code readability by reducing redundancy in command construction.

This change enhances flexibility in handling image pulls across different environments.

What type of PR is this?

bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

crictl pull has never supported an argument named platform

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #TODO

Special notes for reviewers:

Does this PR introduced a user-facing change?

None

Additional documentation, usage docs, etc.:

[kubesphere-prow]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[kubesphere-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: LazyBusyYang
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign pixiake for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[kubesphere-prow]

Welcome @LazyBusyYang! It looks like this is your first PR to kubesphere/kubekey 🎉

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[pixiake]

@LazyBusyYang Thanks for this contributions. Please add sig-off for you commit.