Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing bookworm and bullseye .deb packages #44

Open
prulloac opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Missing bookworm and bullseye .deb packages #44

prulloac opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@prulloac
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I'm openning this issue to raise the concern of missing tarballs for other ubuntu/debian versions. If possible, I would like to help with this to contribute on the ghost community

@mkasberg
Copy link
Owner

You mean you want Debian .deb packages for Bullseye and Bookworm?

This should be possible now that #2 is merged. (Since we can use Docker as a build env, we're not limited to GitHub Actions runners on Ubuntu.) I don't think it would be terribly difficult; at a high level, we'd need to slightly refactor build.yml so that it can build not only on different Ubuntu versions but also on different images (e.g. debian). Some important places that would need to be adjusted to handle debian are the build matrix, Dockerfile, and output filename in the build script. You're welcome to work on this, and I'd merge it if we get something working that's well-written.

@mkasberg mkasberg changed the title Missing bookworm and bullseye tarballs Missing bookworm and bullseye .deb packages Jan 18, 2025
@wico-elfgen
Copy link

@mkasberg would it be possible to add a package for ubuntu 20.04 as well?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants