Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Use rootMoves[PVIdx].previousScore instead of bestValue for dynamic contempt. This is equivalent for MultiPV=1 (bench remained the same, even for higher depths), but more correct for MultiPV. STC (MultiPV=3): LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00] Total: 2657 W: 1079 L: 898 D: 680 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5aaa47cb0ebc590297330403 LTC (MultiPV=3): LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00] Total: 2390 W: 874 L: 706 D: 810 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5aaa593a0ebc59029733040b VLTC 240+2.4 (MultiPV=3): LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00] Total: 2399 W: 861 L: 694 D: 844 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5aaf983e0ebc5902a182131f LTC (MultiPV=4, Skill Level=17): LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00] Total: 747 W: 333 L: 175 D: 239 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5aabccee0ebc5902997ff006 Note: although the ELO differences seem huge, they are inflated by the nature of Skill Level / MultiPV search, so I don't think they can be reasonably compared with classic ELO strength. See official-stockfish#1491 for some verifications searches with MultiPV = 10 at depths 12 and 24 from the starting position and the position after 1.e4, comparing the outputs of the full PV by the old master and by this patch. No functional change for MultiPV=1
- Loading branch information