Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8280682: Refactor AOT code source validation checks #23476

Conversation

calvinccheung
Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung commented Feb 5, 2025

This changset refactors CDS class paths and module paths validation code into a new class AOTCodeSource and related class AOTCodeSourceConfig. Code has been moved from filemap.[c|h]pp, classLoader.[c|h]pp, and classLoaderExt.[c|h]pp to aotCodeSource.[c|h]pp. CDS dependencies have been removed from classLoader.cpp. More refactoring could be done, such as removing classLoaderExt.cpp, in a future RFE.

Passed tiers 1 - 5 testing.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8280682: Refactor AOT code source validation checks (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Contributors

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23476/head:pull/23476
$ git checkout pull/23476

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23476
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23476/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23476

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23476

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23476.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 5, 2025

👋 Welcome back ccheung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 5, 2025

@calvinccheung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8280682: Refactor AOT code source validation checks

Co-authored-by: Ioi Lam <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: iklam, asmehra, dholmes, kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 222 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 65f79c1: 8347335: ZGC: Use limitless mark stack memory
  • e410af0: 8342393: Promote commutative vector IR node sharing
  • f755fad: 8349653: Clarify the docs for MemorySegment::reinterpret
  • a5c9a4d: 8349032: C2: Parse Predicate refactoring in Loop Unswitching broke fix for JDK-8290850
  • 302bed0: 8350499: Minimal build fails with slowdebug builds
  • 0795d11: 8350464: The flags to set the native priority for the VMThread and Java threads need a broader range
  • 05b4812: 8350041: Skip test/jdk/java/lang/String/nativeEncoding/StringPlatformChars.java on static JDK
  • a891630: 8350480: RISC-V: Relax assertion about registers in C2_MacroAssembler::minmax_fp
  • 5cbd9d1: 8349959: Test CR6740048.java passes unexpectedly missing CR6740048.xsd
  • 25322aa: 8350258: AArch64: Client build fails after JDK-8347917
  • ... and 212 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/618c5eb27b4c719afd577b690e6bcb21a45fcb0d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 5, 2025

@calvinccheung The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

/contributor add @iklam

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2025

@calvinccheung
Contributor Ioi Lam <[email protected]> successfully added.

@calvinccheung calvinccheung marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 20:24
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 7, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. A few suggestions for the in-line comments.

@ashu-mehra
Copy link
Contributor

Just one more comment, rest looks good.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a very large change to try and digest. Is it really just a refactor? I've made a few comments in places where it seems functionality may have been changed as well.

@vnkozlov
Copy link
Contributor

Passing by comment. We touched it on recent Leyden meeting. The name "AOTCodeSource" is very confusing. Especially when we start caching AOT compiled code. Can we rename it to avoid confusion?

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

Passing by comment. We touched it on recent Leyden meeting. The name "AOTCodeSource" is very confusing. Especially when we start caching AOT compiled code. Can we rename it to avoid confusion?

Per our discussions, I've renamed "AOTCodeSource" to "AOTClassLocation". I also renamed the related classes.

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for renaming classes.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of minor suggestions, but otherwise nothing further from me.

Thanks

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 24, 2025
@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

@dholmes-ora, @ashu-mehra, @vnkozlov, @iklam Thanks for the reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Going to push as commit ddb256911032cd7e6fae17c342261276066d8d25.
Since your change was applied there have been 222 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 65f79c1: 8347335: ZGC: Use limitless mark stack memory
  • e410af0: 8342393: Promote commutative vector IR node sharing
  • f755fad: 8349653: Clarify the docs for MemorySegment::reinterpret
  • a5c9a4d: 8349032: C2: Parse Predicate refactoring in Loop Unswitching broke fix for JDK-8290850
  • 302bed0: 8350499: Minimal build fails with slowdebug builds
  • 0795d11: 8350464: The flags to set the native priority for the VMThread and Java threads need a broader range
  • 05b4812: 8350041: Skip test/jdk/java/lang/String/nativeEncoding/StringPlatformChars.java on static JDK
  • a891630: 8350480: RISC-V: Relax assertion about registers in C2_MacroAssembler::minmax_fp
  • 5cbd9d1: 8349959: Test CR6740048.java passes unexpectedly missing CR6740048.xsd
  • 25322aa: 8350258: AArch64: Client build fails after JDK-8347917
  • ... and 212 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/618c5eb27b4c719afd577b690e6bcb21a45fcb0d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 24, 2025

@calvinccheung Pushed as commit ddb2569.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@calvinccheung calvinccheung deleted the 8280682-refactor-code-source-check branch February 25, 2025 00:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants