Auditable & minimal JS implementation of public-key post-quantum cryptography.
- 🔒 Auditable
- 🔻 Tree-shakeable: unused code is excluded from your builds
- 🔍 Reliable: tests ensure correctness
- 🦾 ML-KEM & CRYSTALS-Kyber: lattice-based kem from FIPS-203
- 🔋 ML-DSA & CRYSTALS-Dilithium: lattice-based signatures from FIPS-204
- 🐈 SLH-DSA & SPHINCS+: hash-based Winternitz signatures from FIPS-205
- 🪶 37KB (15KB gzipped) for everything with bundled hashes
Take a glance at GitHub Discussions for questions and support.
Important
NIST published IR 8547, prohibiting classical cryptography (RSA, DSA, ECDSA, ECDH) after 2035. Australian ASD does same thing after 2030. Take it into an account while designing a new cryptographic system.
noble cryptography — high-security, easily auditable set of contained cryptographic libraries and tools.
- Zero or minimal dependencies
- Highly readable TypeScript / JS code
- PGP-signed releases and transparent NPM builds
- All libraries: ciphers, curves, hashes, post-quantum, 4kb secp256k1 / ed25519
- Check out homepage for reading resources, documentation and apps built with noble
npm install @noble/post-quantum
We support all major platforms and runtimes. For Deno, ensure to use npm specifier. For React Native, you may need a polyfill for getRandomValues. A standalone file noble-post-quantum.js is also available.
// import * from '@noble/post-quantum'; // Error: use sub-imports instead
import { ml_kem512, ml_kem768, ml_kem1024 } from '@noble/post-quantum/ml-kem';
import { ml_dsa44, ml_dsa65, ml_dsa87 } from '@noble/post-quantum/ml-dsa';
import {
slh_dsa_sha2_128f, slh_dsa_sha2_128s,
slh_dsa_sha2_192f, slh_dsa_sha2_192s,
slh_dsa_sha2_256f, slh_dsa_sha2_256s,
slh_dsa_shake_128f, slh_dsa_shake_128s,
slh_dsa_shake_192f, slh_dsa_shake_192s,
slh_dsa_shake_256f, slh_dsa_shake_256s,
} from '@noble/post-quantum/slh-dsa';
// import { ml_kem768 } from 'npm:@noble/[email protected]/ml-kem'; // Deno
- ML-KEM / Kyber
- ML-DSA / Dilithium
- SLH-DSA / SPHINCS+
- What should I use?
- Security
- Speed
- Contributing & testing
- License
import { ml_kem512, ml_kem768, ml_kem1024 } from '@noble/post-quantum/ml-kem';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/post-quantum/utils';
// 1. [Alice] generates secret & public keys, then sends publicKey to Bob
const seed = randomBytes(64); // seed is optional
const aliceKeys = ml_kem768.keygen(seed);
// 2. [Bob] generates shared secret for Alice publicKey
// bobShared never leaves [Bob] system and is unknown to other parties
const { cipherText, sharedSecret: bobShared } = ml_kem768.encapsulate(aliceKeys.publicKey);
// 3. [Alice] gets and decrypts cipherText from Bob
const aliceShared = ml_kem768.decapsulate(cipherText, aliceKeys.secretKey);
// Now, both Alice and Both have same sharedSecret key
// without exchanging in plainText: aliceShared == bobShared
// Warning: Can be MITM-ed
const carolKeys = kyber1024.keygen();
const carolShared = kyber1024.decapsulate(cipherText, carolKeys.secretKey); // No error!
notDeepStrictEqual(aliceShared, carolShared); // Different key!
Lattice-based key encapsulation mechanism, defined in FIPS-203.
See website and repo. There are some concerns with regards to security: see djb blog and mailing list. Old, incompatible version (Kyber) is not provided. Open an issue if you need it.
Warning
Unlike ECDH, KEM doesn't verify whether it was "Bob" who've sent the ciphertext.
Instead of throwing an error when the ciphertext is encrypted by a different pubkey,
decapsulate
will simply return a different shared secret.
ML-KEM is also probabilistic and relies on quality of CSPRNG.
import { ml_dsa44, ml_dsa65, ml_dsa87 } from '@noble/post-quantum/ml-dsa';
import { utf8ToBytes, randomBytes } from '@noble/post-quantum/utils';
const seed = randomBytes(32); // seed is optional
const keys = ml_dsa65.keygen(seed);
const msg = utf8ToBytes('hello noble');
const sig = ml_dsa65.sign(keys.secretKey, msg);
const isValid = ml_dsa65.verify(keys.publicKey, msg, sig);
Lattice-based digital signature algorithm, defined in FIPS-204. See website and repo. The internals are similar to ML-KEM, but keys and params are different.
import {
slh_dsa_sha2_128f, slh_dsa_sha2_128s,
slh_dsa_sha2_192f, slh_dsa_sha2_192s,
slh_dsa_sha2_256f, slh_dsa_sha2_256s,
slh_dsa_shake_128f, slh_dsa_shake_128s,
slh_dsa_shake_192f, slh_dsa_shake_192s,
slh_dsa_shake_256f, slh_dsa_shake_256s,
} from '@noble/post-quantum/slh-dsa';
import { utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/post-quantum/utils';
const keys2 = sph.keygen();
const msg2 = utf8ToBytes('hello noble');
const sig2 = sph.sign(keys2.secretKey, msg2);
const isValid2 = sph.verify(keys2.publicKey, msg2, sig2);
Hash-based digital signature algorithm, defined in FIPS-205. See website and repo. We implement spec v3.1 with FIPS adjustments.
There are many different kinds,
but basically sha2
/ shake
indicate internal hash, 128
/ 192
/ 256
indicate security level, and s
/f
indicate trade-off (Small / Fast).
SLH-DSA is slow: see benchmarks for key size & speed.
Speed | Key size | Sig size | Created in | Popularized in | Post-quantum? | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSA | Normal | 256B - 2KB | 256B - 2KB | 1970s | 1990s | No |
ECC | Normal | 32 - 256B | 48 - 128B | 1980s | 2010s | No |
ML-KEM | Fast | 1.6 - 31KB | 1KB | 1990s | 2020s | Yes |
ML-DSA | Normal | 1.3 - 2.5KB | 2.5 - 4.5KB | 1990s | 2020s | Yes |
SLH-DSA | Slow | 32 - 128B | 17 - 50KB | 1970s | 2020s | Yes |
FN-DSA | Slow | 0.9 - 1.8KB | 0.6 - 1.2KB | 1990s | 2020s | Yes |
We suggest to use ECC + ML-KEM for key agreement, ECC + SLH-DSA for signatures.
ML-KEM and ML-DSA are lattice-based. SLH-DSA is hash-based, which means it is built on top of older, more conservative primitives. NIST guidance for security levels:
- Category 3 (~AES-192): ML-KEM-768, ML-DSA-65, SLH-DSA-[SHA2/shake]-192[s/f]
- Category 5 (~AES-256): ML-KEM-1024, ML-DSA-87, SLH-DSA-[SHA2/shake]-256[s/f]
NIST recommends to use cat-3+, while australian ASD only allows cat-5 after 2030.
For hashes, use SHA512 or SHA3-512 (not SHA256); and for ciphers ensure AES-256 or ChaCha.
The library has not been independently audited yet.
There is no protection against side-channel attacks. Keep in mind that even hardware versions ML-KEM are vulnerable.
If you see anything unusual: investigate and report.
Noble is the fastest JS implementation of post-quantum algorithms. WASM libraries can be faster.
OPs/sec | Keygen | Signing | Verification | Shared secret |
---|---|---|---|---|
ECC x/ed25519 | 10270 | 5110 | 1050 | 1470 |
ML-KEM-768 | 2300 | 2000 | ||
ML-DSA65 | 386 | 120 | 367 | |
SLH-DSA-SHA2-192f | 166 | 6 | 111 |
For SLH-DSA, SHAKE slows everything down 8x, and -s versions do another 20-50x slowdown.
Detailed benchmarks on Apple M2:
ML-KEM
keygen
├─ML-KEM-512 x 3,784 ops/sec @ 264μs/op
├─ML-KEM-768 x 2,305 ops/sec @ 433μs/op
└─ML-KEM-1024 x 1,510 ops/sec @ 662μs/op
encrypt
├─ML-KEM-512 x 3,283 ops/sec @ 304μs/op
├─ML-KEM-768 x 1,993 ops/sec @ 501μs/op
└─ML-KEM-1024 x 1,366 ops/sec @ 731μs/op
decrypt
├─ML-KEM-512 x 3,450 ops/sec @ 289μs/op
├─ML-KEM-768 x 2,035 ops/sec @ 491μs/op
└─ML-KEM-1024 x 1,343 ops/sec @ 744μs/op
ML-DSA
keygen
├─ML-DSA44 x 669 ops/sec @ 1ms/op
├─ML-DSA65 x 386 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
└─ML-DSA87 x 236 ops/sec @ 4ms/op
sign
├─ML-DSA44 x 123 ops/sec @ 8ms/op
├─ML-DSA65 x 120 ops/sec @ 8ms/op
└─ML-DSA87 x 78 ops/sec @ 12ms/op
verify
├─ML-DSA44 x 618 ops/sec @ 1ms/op
├─ML-DSA65 x 367 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
└─ML-DSA87 x 220 ops/sec @ 4ms/op
SLH-DSA (_shake is 8x slower):
sig size | keygen | sign | verify | |
---|---|---|---|---|
sha2_128f | 18088 | 4ms | 90ms | 6ms |
sha2_128s | 7856 | 260ms | 2000ms | 2ms |
sha2_192f | 35664 | 6ms | 160ms | 9ms |
sha2_192s | 16224 | 380ms | 3800ms | 3ms |
sha2_256f | 49856 | 15ms | 340ms | 9ms |
sha2_256s | 29792 | 250ms | 3400ms | 4ms |
npm install && npm run build && npm test
will build the code and run tests.npm run lint
/npm run format
will run linter / fix linter issues.npm run bench
will run benchmarks, which may need their deps first (npm run bench:install
)cd build && npm install && npm run build:release
will build single file
Check out github.com/paulmillr/guidelines for general coding practices and rules.
See paulmillr.com/noble for useful resources, articles, documentation and demos related to the library.
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2024 Paul Miller (https://paulmillr.com)
See LICENSE file.