Skip to content

Conversation

jeltz
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeltz jeltz commented Jul 29, 2025

We have changed our process to not assign any reviewer autoamtically but to only do so manually if that is desired.

We have changed our process to not assign any reviewer autoamtically but
to only do so manually if that is desired.
@jeltz jeltz requested a review from artemgavrilov as a code owner July 29, 2025 15:21
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.83%. Comparing base (a329aeb) to head (96a470f).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on TDE_REL_17_STABLE.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (81.83%) is below the target coverage (90.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           TDE_REL_17_STABLE     #494      +/-   ##
=====================================================
- Coverage              83.68%   81.83%   -1.85%     
=====================================================
  Files                     21       24       +3     
  Lines                   2771     3001     +230     
  Branches                 435      489      +54     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    2319     2456     +137     
- Misses                   368      447      +79     
- Partials                  84       98      +14     
Components Coverage Δ
access 81.17% <0.00%> (-1.10%) ⬇️
catalog 87.85% <ø> (ø)
common 77.77% <ø> (ø)
encryption 73.45% <ø> (ø)
keyring 73.21% <ø> (ø)
src 94.15% <ø> (+6.59%) ⬆️
smgr 94.85% <ø> (ø)
transam ∅ <ø> (∅)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jeltz jeltz merged commit 01a88bf into percona:TDE_REL_17_STABLE Jul 29, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@jeltz jeltz deleted the tde/codeowners branch August 10, 2025 21:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants