Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
docs: special relativity
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
philiplinden committed Dec 31, 2024
1 parent 17f150a commit 039de7f
Showing 1 changed file with 55 additions and 2 deletions.
57 changes: 55 additions & 2 deletions docs/relativity/01-special.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ distance and time are _not absolute_, they are _relative_. The time or distance
can change depending on the observer's reference frame, but **distance traveled
by a photon divided by elapsed time is always $c$.**

## Time is relative
## Truth is in the eye of the ~~beholder~~ observer

The time experienced by an observer in its inertial frame is called its _proper_
_time_. Something interesting happens when we compare the proper time of a body
Expand All @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ Time dilation is the lengthening of the time interval between two events for an
observer in an inertial frame that is moving with respect to the rest frame of
the events (in which the events occur at the same location).
The proper time interval $\Delta \tau$ between two events is the time interval
measured by an observer for whom both events occur at the same location.
([source](https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-3/pages/5-3-time-dilation))
```

Expand All @@ -115,4 +118,54 @@ photon makes one full round trip. Since the speed of light is constant in all
inertial reference frames, an observer will **always** observe the photon moving
at the speed of light, $c$, regardless of the motion of its source.

[ insert visualization of a photon clock ]
```admonish example
An astronaut observes a photon in the light clock on a spaceship moving at a
constant velocity, $v$, relative to the Earth. An astronomer on Earth also
observes the same photon in the light clock. Both observers measure the time it
takes for the photon to make one full round trip.
- The astronaut observes the photon moving at exactly the speed of light, $c$.
- The astronomer observes the photon moving at exactly the speed of light, $c$.
- The astronaut and astronomer disagree on the time it takes for the photon to
make one full round trip in the light clock.
**Problem**: Whose round-trip duration measurement is correct?
**Solution**: The astronaut and astronomer are both correct! It's not a trick
question, this time---we can solve it with 8th-grade math and disciplined logic.
In the astronaut's inertial frame:
- The photon moves at speed $c$.
- The light clock is at rest so the photon travels $2D$ in the time it takes to
complete one round trip.
- The time it takes for the photon to make one full round trip is
$\Delta t = \frac{2D}{c}$.
In the astronomer's inertial frame:
- The photon moves at speed $c$.
- The light clock is moving so the photon travels a longer distance in the time
it takes to make one full round trip.
- The photon travels sideways a distance $v \Delta t$ in addition to the
distance $2D$ it travels up and down between the mirrors.
- The total distance the photon travels can be found by pythagorean theorem.
One side of a right triangle is $2D$ and the other side is $v \Delta t$. The
hypotenuse is the total distance the photon travels over one tick, $s$.
$$
s = \sqrt{(2D)^2 + (v \Delta t)^2}
$$
- The time it takes for the photon to make one full round trip is
$\Delta t = \frac{2 \sqrt{D^2 + (v \Delta t)^2}}{c}$.
```

We see here that both of Einstein's postulates are satisfied, and we have not
violated any laws of physics. Yet two observers measured the photon taking
different durations to make the same trip in space. How can this be?

```admonish help
Remember that physics and science do not describe the _truth_, they describe
math and logical axioms that are consistent with the observed data. As
counterintuitive as it may be,
[special relativity overwhelmingly agrees with scientific observations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity).
```

### Exploring time dilation

0 comments on commit 039de7f

Please sign in to comment.