fix: migrate Azure resource models to avoid using SDK defaults

[puchy22]

Context

Use default models from Azure SDK was causing problem.

Fix #6698

Description

Search all models from Azure SDK, review what attributes are needed for checks and create a new model with that attributes and change the constructor when they are created in the service and change tests if needed.

Checklist

• Are there new checks included in this PR? No
  • If so, do we need to update permissions for the provider? Please review this carefully.
• Review if the code is being covered by tests.
• Review if code is being documented following this specification https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.md#38-comments-and-docstrings
• Review if backport is needed.
• Review if is needed to change the Readme.md

API

• Verify if API specs need to be regenerated.
• Check if version updates are required (e.g., specs, Poetry, etc.).
• Ensure new entries are added to CHANGELOG.md, if applicable.

License

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.62673% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.72%. Comparing base (fb5ea3c) to head (feb78ac).
Report is 24 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6880      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.75%   88.72%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        1200     1200              
  Lines       34611    34822     +211     
==========================================
+ Hits        30720    30896     +176     
- Misses       3891     3926      +35     

Flag	Coverage Δ
prowler	88.72% <92.62%> (-0.04%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
prowler	88.72% <92.62%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
api	∅ <ø> (∅)