-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 237
DOC-5503 enable TCE overrides #1889
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@andy-stark-redis: this looks great! I do have a couple of suggestions:
- Maybe create per-language buckets under local_examples? Otherwise, it could get ugly very quickly.
- Augie created the runnable local_examples.py file, but maybe that won't be needed? If not, I'd suggest integrating the local examples processing into the existing build/components and/or build/examples structure.
No hurry on either of these; both can wait until another time. Also, I have no quarrel if you decide you'd rather not do either.
I like the idea of named parameters. Augie could probably make fast work of it.
Thanks @dwdougherty ! I'll merge this in its current state and fix the time series examples, etc, then I'll get on with implementing your suggestions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree with @dwdougherty's suggestions and also agree with adding named parameters for all of this, but it otherwise looks great! Thank you for taking a look.
DOC-5503
This builds on David's great start, modifying the build to allow local TCE example files. The further changes are:
clients-example
shortcode).I've left the
/develop/clients/test-local-examples
test file in place and also the example local source files in thelocal_examples
folder. These files demonstrate the changes but of course, I'll delete them before merging :-)Also, with all these parameters to this shortcode now, maybe we should consider switching to named parameters? This would be a separate PR, as it would involve changing all the existing TCEs, but it might be neater and more convenient to use.