-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
Delete account join request when redeeming an invite #352
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
""" WalkthroughThe Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant WebApp
participant Database
User->>WebApp: Redeem invite
WebApp->>Database: Create user-to-org membership
WebApp->>Database: Update user
WebApp->>Database: Delete invite
WebApp->>Database: Query for matching account request
alt Account request exists
WebApp->>Database: Delete account request
WebApp->>WebApp: Log info
end
WebApp->>Database: Increment billing seat count
WebApp-->>User: Return result
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changesNo out-of-scope changes found. Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/web/src/actions.ts (1)
1150-1166
: Minor optimisation: avoid redundant readAfter correcting the composite key, you can eliminate the initial
findUnique
and do a singledeleteMany
:-const accountRequest = await tx.accountRequest.findUnique({ ... }); - -if (accountRequest) { - await tx.accountRequest.delete({ - where: { id: accountRequest.id }, - }); -} +await tx.accountRequest.deleteMany({ + where: { + requestedById: user.id, + orgId: invite.orgId, + }, +});This is idempotent, cheaper, and avoids two round-trips inside the transaction.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/web/src/actions.ts
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build
@msukkari could you add a changelog? |
Fixes #337
Summary by CodeRabbit