feature/support-lm-reasoning-field

[xucailiang]

‘ reasoning_field’ is a custom field, so it can be adapted to any LLM with a reasoning process, or it can be completely ignored if needed.

The test script is as follows:

import dspy

lm = dspy.LM('deepseek/deepseek-reasoner', api_key='sk-xxx', reasoning_field='reasoning_content')
dspy.configure(lm=lm)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    react = dspy.ChainOfThought("question -> answer")
    pred = react(question="Who is Apple's CEO?")
    
    lm.inspect_history()
    print("answer", pred.answer)

[isaacbmiller]

thanks for the contribution - i haven't seen this field before.

which provider(s) are including this instead of the tags

[xucailiang]

thanks for the contribution - i haven't seen this field before.

which provider(s) are including this instead of the tags

This field originates from Deepseek, and you can access the same field parameter when using LiteLLM. I have some questions about this issues

It's clearly a model-specific parameter that not all providers support. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this matter. Thanks!