-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[cxx-interop] Fix assertion failure from unavailable typedef + enum pattern #81625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
j-hui
wants to merge
4
commits into
swiftlang:main
Choose a base branch
from
j-hui:fix-unavailable-enum
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+136
−136
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c7070e7
[NFC] [cxx-interop] Consolidate uses of findOptionSetType() helper fu…
j-hui 5aa5bcf
[NFC] [cxx-interop] Flatten findOptionSetEnum() and move it to Import…
j-hui 2c7d01f
[NFC] Use explicit ImportedType() constructor
j-hui 75e4f04
[cxx-interop] Fix assertion failure from unavailable NS_ENUM typedef
j-hui File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ | ||
// RUN: split-file %s %t | ||
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -typecheck -verify %t/main.swift -I %t/include -module-name main | ||
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -typecheck -verify %t/main.swift -I %t/include -module-name main -cxx-interoperability-mode=default | ||
// REQUIRES: objc_interop | ||
|
||
//--- include/module.modulemap | ||
module ObjCModule { | ||
header "header.h" | ||
} | ||
|
||
//--- include/header.h | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should we have this test somewhere around |
||
#include <Foundation/Foundation.h> | ||
|
||
#define UNAVAILABLE API_UNAVAILABLE(macos) | ||
|
||
UNAVAILABLE | ||
typedef NS_ENUM(NSUInteger, MyUnavailableEnum) { | ||
MyUnavailableEnumCase1 = 0, | ||
MyUnavailableEnumCase2, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
UNAVAILABLE | ||
void unavailableParam(MyUnavailableEnum e); | ||
|
||
UNAVAILABLE | ||
MyUnavailableEnum unavailableReturn(void); | ||
|
||
struct UNAVAILABLE UnavailableStruct { | ||
MyUnavailableEnum field; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
UNAVAILABLE | ||
@interface UnavailableClass | ||
@property (nonatomic, readonly) MyUnavailableEnum prop; | ||
@end | ||
|
||
UNAVAILABLE | ||
__attribute__((swift_name("getter:UnavailableStruct.iProp(self:)"))) | ||
inline MyUnavailableEnum getUnavailableInjProp(struct UnavailableStruct s) { | ||
return MyUnavailableEnumCase1; | ||
} | ||
|
||
//--- main.swift | ||
import Foundation | ||
import ObjCModule | ||
|
||
@available(*, unavailable) | ||
func useParam(_ e: MyUnavailableEnum) { unavailableParam(e) } | ||
|
||
@available(*, unavailable) | ||
func useReturn() -> MyUnavailableEnum { return unavailableReturn() } | ||
|
||
@available(*, unavailable) | ||
func useField(_ o: UnavailableStruct) -> MyUnavailableEnum { return o.field } | ||
|
||
@available(*, unavailable) | ||
func useIProp(_ o: UnavailableStruct) -> MyUnavailableEnum { return o.iProp } | ||
|
||
@available(*, unavailable) | ||
func useProp(_ o: UnavailableClass) -> MyUnavailableEnum { return o.prop } |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess having these as
ASSERT
overassert
might cause these to start failing in release builds, which might be a bit risky for 6.2... I don't have a strong opinion on this.