Identify locks flagged by lockdep

When running a kernel with CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y, lockdep reports possible
recursive locking in some cases and possible circular locking dependency
in others, within the SPL and ZFS modules.

This patch uses a mutex type defined in SPL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, to mark
such mutexes when they are initialized.  This mutex type causes
attempts to take or release those locks to be wrapped in lockdep_off()
and lockdep_on() calls to silence the dependency checker and allow the
use of lock_stats to examine contention.

For RW locks, it uses an analogous lock type, RW_NOLOCKDEP.

The goal is that these locks are ultimately changed back to type
MUTEX_DEFAULT or RW_DEFAULT, after the locks are annotated to reflect
their relationship (e.g. z_name_lock below) or any real problem with the
lock dependencies are fixed.

Some of the affected locks are:

tc_open_lock:
=============
This is an array of locks, all with same name, which txg_quiesce must
take all of in order to move txg to next state.  All default to the same
lockdep class, and so to lockdep appears recursive.

zp->z_name_lock:
================
In zfs_rmdir,
        dzp = znode for the directory (input to zfs_dirent_lock)
        zp  = znode for the entry being removed (output of zfs_dirent_lock)

zfs_rmdir()->zfs_dirent_lock() takes z_name_lock in dzp
zfs_rmdir() takes z_name_lock in zp

Since both dzp and zp are type znode_t, the locks have the same default
class, and lockdep considers it a possible recursive lock attempt.

l->l_rwlock:
============
zap_expand_leaf() sometimes creates two new zap leaf structures, via
these call paths:

zap_deref_leaf()->zap_get_leaf_byblk()->zap_leaf_open()
zap_expand_leaf()->zap_create_leaf()->zap_expand_leaf()->zap_create_leaf()

Because both zap_leaf_open() and zap_create_leaf() initialize
l->l_rwlock in their (separate) leaf structures, the lockdep class is
the same, and the linux kernel believes these might both be the same
lock, and emits a possible recursive lock warning.

Signed-off-by: Olaf Faaland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#3895

module/zfs/dbuf.c

@@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ dbuf_dirty(dmu_buf_impl_t *db, dmu_tx_t *tx)
 		}
 		dr->dt.dl.dr_data = data_old;
 	} else {
-		mutex_init(&dr->dt.di.dr_mtx, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+		mutex_init(&dr->dt.di.dr_mtx, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
 		list_create(&dr->dt.di.dr_children,
 		    sizeof (dbuf_dirty_record_t),
 		    offsetof(dbuf_dirty_record_t, dr_dirty_node));

module/zfs/dnode.c

@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ dnode_cons(void *arg, void *unused, int kmflag)
 	dnode_t *dn = arg;
 	int i;
 
-	rw_init(&dn->dn_struct_rwlock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
+	rw_init(&dn->dn_struct_rwlock, NULL, RW_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
 	mutex_init(&dn->dn_mtx, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
 	mutex_init(&dn->dn_dbufs_mtx, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
 	cv_init(&dn->dn_notxholds, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);

module/zfs/multilist.c

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ multilist_create(multilist_t *ml, size_t size, size_t offset, unsigned int num,
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ml->ml_num_sublists; i++) {
 		multilist_sublist_t *mls = &ml->ml_sublists[i];
-		mutex_init(&mls->mls_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+		mutex_init(&mls->mls_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
 		list_create(&mls->mls_list, size, offset);
 	}
 }

module/zfs/txg.c

@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ txg_init(dsl_pool_t *dp, uint64_t txg)
 		int i;
 
 		mutex_init(&tx->tx_cpu[c].tc_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
-		mutex_init(&tx->tx_cpu[c].tc_open_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT,
+		mutex_init(&tx->tx_cpu[c].tc_open_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP,
 		    NULL);
 		for (i = 0; i < TXG_SIZE; i++) {
 			cv_init(&tx->tx_cpu[c].tc_cv[i], NULL, CV_DEFAULT,

module/zfs/vdev.c

@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ vdev_alloc_common(spa_t *spa, uint_t id, uint64_t guid, vdev_ops_t *ops)
 
 	list_link_init(&vd->vdev_config_dirty_node);
 	list_link_init(&vd->vdev_state_dirty_node);
-	mutex_init(&vd->vdev_dtl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+	mutex_init(&vd->vdev_dtl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
 	mutex_init(&vd->vdev_stat_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
 	mutex_init(&vd->vdev_probe_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
 	for (t = 0; t < DTL_TYPES; t++) {

module/zfs/zap.c

@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ zap_create_leaf(zap_t *zap, dmu_tx_t *tx)
 
 	ASSERT(RW_WRITE_HELD(&zap->zap_rwlock));
 
-	rw_init(&l->l_rwlock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
+	rw_init(&l->l_rwlock, NULL, RW_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
 	rw_enter(&l->l_rwlock, RW_WRITER);
 	l->l_blkid = zap_allocate_blocks(zap, 1);
 	l->l_dbuf = NULL;

module/zfs/zfs_znode.c

@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ zfs_znode_cache_constructor(void *buf, void *arg, int kmflags)
 
 	mutex_init(&zp->z_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
 	rw_init(&zp->z_parent_lock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
-	rw_init(&zp->z_name_lock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
+	rw_init(&zp->z_name_lock, NULL, RW_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
 	mutex_init(&zp->z_acl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
 	rw_init(&zp->z_xattr_lock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
 

module/zfs/zio.c

@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ zio_create(zio_t *pio, spa_t *spa, uint64_t txg, const blkptr_t *bp,
 	zio = kmem_cache_alloc(zio_cache, KM_SLEEP);
 	bzero(zio, sizeof (zio_t));
 
-	mutex_init(&zio->io_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+	mutex_init(&zio->io_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
 	cv_init(&zio->io_cv, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
 
 	list_create(&zio->io_parent_list, sizeof (zio_link_t),