Skip to content

Unit Testing Blobs Fees Adjustments #151

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

gabriele-0201
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

This was referenced Dec 22, 2023
Copy link
Contributor Author

gabriele-0201 commented Dec 22, 2023

@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 force-pushed the gab_refactor_blobs_fees branch from 1db33e8 to d475f38 Compare December 22, 2023 20:38
@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 force-pushed the gab_unit_testing_blobs_fees branch from db9e648 to 21e8075 Compare December 22, 2023 20:39
@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 force-pushed the gab_refactor_blobs_fees branch from d475f38 to e9f4b85 Compare December 24, 2023 12:31
@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 force-pushed the gab_unit_testing_blobs_fees branch from 21e8075 to 0b83f5f Compare December 24, 2023 12:31
@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 marked this pull request as ready for review December 24, 2023 12:40
@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 force-pushed the gab_refactor_blobs_fees branch from e9f4b85 to 6dde8c3 Compare December 27, 2023 14:44
@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 force-pushed the gab_unit_testing_blobs_fees branch from 0b83f5f to 2e4d0ee Compare December 27, 2023 14:46
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 27, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-site ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 27, 2023 6:19pm

>::convert(fee_multiplier);
assert_eq!(new_fee_multiplier, expected_fee_multiplier);

// TODO: Ensure length multiplier is update properly
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hanging TODO

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is addressed in #153. In this stack of PRs, I've found it useful to describe some TODOs and address them later. The problem is that I haven't left any information in the code. From now on, I will avoid this approach because, in the end, it just seems confusing to others

@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 force-pushed the gab_refactor_blobs_fees branch from d1fe412 to 4b7e1b3 Compare December 28, 2023 09:15
@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 force-pushed the gab_unit_testing_blobs_fees branch from 820acb4 to 2e0a93f Compare December 28, 2023 09:15
@gabriele-0201 gabriele-0201 mentioned this pull request Dec 28, 2023
5 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

rphmeier commented Dec 28, 2023

Merge activity

  • Dec 28, 3:09 PM: @rphmeier started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
  • Dec 28, 3:10 PM: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
  • Dec 28, 3:11 PM: @rphmeier merged this pull request with Graphite.

Base automatically changed from gab_refactor_blobs_fees to main December 28, 2023 20:09
@rphmeier rphmeier force-pushed the gab_unit_testing_blobs_fees branch from 2e0a93f to 8da344d Compare December 28, 2023 20:09
@rphmeier rphmeier merged commit ecc6306 into main Dec 28, 2023
@rphmeier rphmeier deleted the gab_unit_testing_blobs_fees branch December 28, 2023 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants