[pull] master from postgres:master #1015
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![pull[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12910?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Currently, we do not support Memoize for SEMI and ANTI joins because nested loop SEMI/ANTI joins do not scan the inner relation to completion, which prevents Memoize from marking the cache entry as complete. One might argue that we could mark the cache entry as complete after fetching the first inner tuple, but that would not be safe: if the first inner tuple and the current outer tuple do not satisfy the join clauses, a second inner tuple matching the parameters would find the cache entry already marked as complete. However, if the inner side is provably unique, this issue doesn't arise, since there would be no second matching tuple. That said, this doesn't help in the case of SEMI joins, because a SEMI join with a provably unique inner side would already have been reduced to an inner join by reduce_unique_semijoins. Therefore, in this patch, we check whether the inner relation is provably unique for ANTI joins and enable the use of Memoize in such cases. Author: Richard Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: wenhui qiu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48FdLiMNrmJL-g6mDvoQVt0yNyJAqMkv4e2Pk-5GKCZLA@mail.gmail.com
Currently check_recovery_target_timeline() converts any value that is not "current", "latest", or a valid integer to 0. So, for example, the following configuration added to postgresql.conf followed by a startup: recovery_target_timeline = 'bogus' recovery_target_timeline = '9999999999' ... results in the following error patterns: FATAL: 22023: recovery target timeline 0 does not exist FATAL: 22023: recovery target timeline 1410065407 does not exist This is confusing, because the server does not reflect the intention of the user, and just reports incorrect data unrelated to the GUC. The origin of the problem is that we do not perform a range check in the GUC value passed-in for recovery_target_timeline. This commit improves the situation by using strtou64() and by providing stricter range checks. Some test cases are added for the cases of an incorrect, an upper-bound and a lower-bound timeline value, checking the sanity of the reports based on the contents of the server logs. Author: David Steele <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
The COPY FROM command now accepts a non-negative integer for the HEADER option, allowing multiple header lines to be skipped. This is useful when the input contains multi-line headers that should be ignored during data import. Author: Shinya Kato <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOzEurRPxfzbxqeOPF_AGnAUOYf=Wk0we+1LQomPNUNtyZGBZw@mail.gmail.com
The documentation previously stated that the wal_status column is NULL if restart_lsn is NULL in the pg_replication_slots view. This is incorrect, and wal_status can be "lost" even when restart_lsn is NULL. This commit removes the incorrect description. Back-patched to all supported versions. Author: Fujii Masao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <[email protected]> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected] Backpatch-through: 13
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.2)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )