Update takeaways for API Caching #2912
Conversation
chronark
requested review from
perkinsjr,
MichaelUnkey,
mcstepp and
ogzhanolguncu
as code owners
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request enhances the API caching documentation by updating the formatting and content of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼 We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted. Details: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
apps/www/content/glossary/api-caching.mdx (6)
29-39: Updated Best Practices
The best practices are now more actionable with clear recommendations on caching strategies, cache updates, and handling of HTTP headers. Consider expanding the note on HTTP caching headers with a brief rationale to further guide readers.
77-93: FAQ: What is the Best Caching Strategy?
This answer offers a detailed breakdown of different caching strategies with enumerated points. To further enhance clarity, a brief concluding remark summarizing when to choose each strategy might be beneficial.
130-139: Enhanced REST API Caching Best Practices
The best practices segment is well-structured, covering essential aspects such as HTTP header usage, explicit cache durations, cache variation based on parameters, proper invalidation, and security measures. A brief explanation for each recommendation could provide further clarity.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~137-~137: The singular proper name ‘Vary’ must be used with a third-person or a past tense verb.
Context: ...ing optimal cache management. 3. Vary cache by parameters: Cache different respon...(HE_VERB_AGR)
157-172: C++ Caching Example
The C++ example clearly demonstrates caching using anstd::unordered_map. For enhanced clarity, consider including namespace details or type definitions if this snippet is to be used in a larger codebase context.
174-188: Python Caching Example
The Python example demonstrates the use offlask_cachingeffectively. There is an extraneous semicolon at the end of the import statement on line 176; removing it will better adhere to Python style guidelines.
190-211: C# Caching Example
The C# example clearly illustrates caching usingIMemoryCache. The code is well-structured, though a review of minor formatting (e.g., removing any unnecessary blank lines) could further improve consistency.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~210-~210: Opting for a less wordy alternative here can improve the clarity of your writing.
Context: ...mes. Implementing these strategies will not only enhance the performance of your APIs but also ensure a better experience for users, especial...(NOT_ONLY_ALSO)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/www/content/glossary/api-caching.mdx(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (18)
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/rbac
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/nextjs
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/hono
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/cache
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/api
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/clickhouse
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/resend
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/keys
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/id
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/hash
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/encryption
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/billing
- GitHub Check: Build / Build
- GitHub Check: Test API / API Test Local
- GitHub Check: Test Agent Local / test_agent_local
- GitHub Check: Test Go API Local / test_agent_local
- GitHub Check: autofix
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
apps/www/content/glossary/api-caching.mdx (12)
2-6: Updated Title and Header Formatting
The new title, description, and header (h1) improve clarity and readability. The use of single quotes and multiline formatting enhances consistency across the document.
10-16: Enhanced Takeaways Section
The updatedtldrsummary is concise, and the newdidYouKnowfact nicely emphasizes that caching supports offline functionality in Progressive Web Apps—an excellent addition for user insight.
17-28: Revised Usage in APIs Section
The modified tags and expanded description now clearly illustrate the benefits of API caching (e.g., reduced latency, lower server load, and improved system health). This update aligns well with current best practices.
40-46: Refined Historical Context
The historical context now features a more accurate timeline (e.g., “Est. ~1990s”) and neatly summarizes the evolution of API caching. If possible, additional context or specific milestones could further enrich this section.
47-54: Updated Recommended Reading
The new recommended links (including resources on Progressive Web Apps and HTTP caching) are well-chosen and informative. Verify periodically that these external resources remain current and accessible.
67-75: FAQ: What is API Caching?
The answer provides a clear and succinct explanation of API caching and its benefits. It effectively outlines how caching reduces response times and server load.
94-104: FAQ: Optimizing REST API Performance with Caching
The explanation is comprehensive and clearly distinguishes between in-memory caching and HTTP caching approaches. It effectively conveys the rationale behind each method.
107-115: FAQ: How to Store API Data in Cache?
The answer accurately describes the process of caching via key-value stores and explains the lookup-and-store mechanism well. The step-by-step explanation should be clear for most readers.
116-116: Updated Timestamp
The newupdatedAttimestamp is correctly formatted and reflects the latest edits. This helps ensure the document appears current to readers.
120-121: Clarified Introduction Paragraph
The introduction now concisely outlines the benefits of API caching, emphasizing reduced API calls, decreased latency, and lower server load. Consider briefly noting scalability benefits, if relevant.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~121-~121: Opting for a less wordy alternative here can improve the clarity of your writing.
Context: ...lls made to the actual API server. This not only decreases latency but also alleviates server load, which is essential for imp...(NOT_ONLY_ALSO)
122-129: Understanding API Caching Concepts Section
This section and its accompanying bullet list clearly explain the fundamental concepts behind caching. The content is concise and informative, setting a solid foundation for readers.
140-155: Java Caching Example
The Java example, which uses Spring’s@Cacheableannotation, is clear and effectively demonstrates a typical caching implementation. Including additional inline comments or error-handling considerations could make it even more instructive.
This PR updates the takeaways section for API Caching with the latest content from the database.
Changes:
Summary by CodeRabbit