Skip to content

Issues: w3c/did-core

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
25 Open 344 Closed
25 Open 344 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Is it acceptable to implicitly suggest implementing version control for a VDR? pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#580 by shigeya was closed Feb 9, 2021
@shigeya @oed
14
Move "resource=true" parameter from DID Core to the DID Spec Registries pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#577 by jandrieu was closed Feb 11, 2021
@talltree
7
Global uniqueness of method-specific-id is not necessary, also hard to achieve
#575 by shigeya was closed Feb 2, 2021
@shigeya
6
Replace undefined term "resolving party" in equivalence properties editorial Editors should update the spec then close pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#563 by peacekeeper was closed Jan 28, 2021
@peacekeeper
2
There is no description of the difference between resolve and resolveRepresentation functions
#559 by shigeya was closed Feb 8, 2021
@shigeya
2
Question about colons from TAG
#556 by brentzundel was closed Jan 20, 2021
@talltree
5
application/did+dag+cbor not implementable? pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#551 by msporny was closed Feb 11, 2021
@msporny
51
Concerns regarding testability of DID Resolution and Dereferencing pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#549 by msporny was closed Feb 11, 2021
@msporny
14
DID URL dereferencing term definition is inconsistent with its section editorial Editors should update the spec then close pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#545 by peacekeeper was closed Jan 24, 2021
@peacekeeper
2
Replace "herd immunity" with "herd privacy" editorial Editors should update the spec then close pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#538 by jandrieu was closed Jan 20, 2021
1
@peacekeeper
1
extra whitespace after internal references editorial Editors should update the spec then close pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#537 by rhiaro was closed Jan 24, 2021
@rhiaro
Some Question About DID question Further information is requested
#532 by zhanb was closed Jan 13, 2021
@OR13
3
Decentralized Identifiers Improvement Proposal (DIIPs) class 2 Changes that do not functionally affect interpretation of the document discuss Needs further discussion before a pull request can be created extensibility related to extensibility, json-ld contexts, external properties, etc pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections
#530 by jonnycrunch was closed Dec 19, 2024
@jonnycrunch
7
Requirement of MUST for id in Verfication Methods and Service Endpoints? pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections
#529 by iherman was closed Jan 12, 2021
@iherman
7
one more the Data Model needs to be linked editorial Editors should update the spec then close pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections
#527 by TallTed was closed Jan 22, 2021
@rhiaro
3
should indicate what the CBOR integers are counting since Unix epoch
#523 by TallTed was closed Jan 24, 2021
@msporny
9
missing comma in example 37 editorial Editors should update the spec then close pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#520 by bshambaugh was closed Jan 3, 2021
@msporny
1
Minor editorial issue: discrepancy between alsoKnownAs and others editorial Editors should update the spec then close pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#518 by iherman was closed Jan 12, 2021
@iherman
10
Correct the serviceEndpoint property to allow for a string or array of strings pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#506 by csuwildcat was closed Dec 27, 2020
@msporny
2
The definition of "the top-level" of the abstract data model is unclear editorial Editors should update the spec then close
#505 by shigeya was closed Dec 20, 2020
@msporny
7
Issues in "Note on Persistence" in DID Syntax section pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#504 by shigeya was closed Feb 2, 2021
@talltree
7
Decentralized extension is not discussed pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#502 by shigeya was closed Jan 3, 2021
1
@kdenhartog
6
Representation property or representation-specific property ?
#500 by shigeya was closed Dec 15, 2020
4
Metadata properties don't define data model and serialization format pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#499 by msporny was closed Jan 3, 2021
@msporny
3
Datetime data type missing timezone and precision pr exists There is an open PR to address this issue
#498 by msporny was closed Dec 27, 2020
1
@msporny
4
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.