Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update BIP-352 status to Final #1737

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Gudnessuche
Copy link
Contributor

Changed the status of BIP-352 from Proposed to Final to reflect its acceptance and finalization. This update marks the completion of the review process and the formal acceptance of the proposal.

Changed the status of BIP-352 from Proposed to Final to reflect its acceptance and finalization. This update marks the completion of the review process and the formal acceptance of the proposal.
@jonatack
Copy link
Member

jonatack commented Jan 3, 2025

It might be a little early: the current status commit was in 9929215, this BIP was merged less than a year ago in #1458, and further updates may be found as developers implement it more widely. Please provide justification in the pull description for this proposed update based on the criteria enumerated in BIP 2, Section Progression to Final status.

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Author: josibake <[email protected]>
Ruben Somsen <[email protected]>
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0352
Status: Proposed
Status: Final
Copy link
Member

@jonatack jonatack Jan 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this change moves forward, the README would need to be updated as well (in the same commit, and in this pull, not a new one)

@bitcoin bitcoin deleted a comment from SupavineeSerksiri6315 Jan 3, 2025
@bitcoin bitcoin deleted a comment from SupavineeSerksiri6315 Jan 3, 2025
@jonatack jonatack marked this pull request as draft January 6, 2025 16:50
@jonatack
Copy link
Member

Closing for now for the reasons in #1737 (comment). Happy to re-open at your request if you address the feedback.

@jonatack jonatack closed this Jan 10, 2025
@jonatack jonatack added the PR Author action required Needs updates, has unaddressed review comments, or is otherwise waiting for PR author label Jan 10, 2025
@murchandamus
Copy link
Contributor

Just for the record, after taking a look here, I agree with @jonatack. BIP 352 doesn’t seem widely adopted yet, afaia there is only a single implementation, and especially the implementation the BIP’s authors are contributing to is still in progress, so moving it to final seems premature.

@Gudnessuche
Copy link
Contributor Author

I agree.
For me, I just felt, given the DLEQ BIP, got drafted, this BIP seemed sufficient.

I know Josie awaits an upstream PR merge to secp's library to handle all the cryptography heavy lifting, I just felt enough people who got the gist had already started shipping to production. e.g CakeWallet, DanaWallet, SeedSigner, Bitbox02.

The cryptography Josie and Ruben put out is sound!!!!!!!!

@murchandamus
Copy link
Contributor

DanaWallet’s readme describes it as experimental, SeedSigner Silent Payment support seems to be an experiment Keith posted about on Twitter, but there are still open issues for it, and Bitbox only has sending support. While there definitely is some excitement and work is in progress, only CakeWallet has full support. 🤷

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR Author action required Needs updates, has unaddressed review comments, or is otherwise waiting for PR author Proposed BIP modification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants